The Wound That Became the Ministry

There is a pattern I have watched repeat itself so many times in clinical work that it no longer surprises me, though it still moves me.

The person who survived profound loneliness becomes the one others call when they have no one else to call. The person who spent years unable to trust becomes the most trustworthy presence in the room. The one who nearly did not survive their own interior becomes the guide other people need for theirs.

The wound and the ministry are not separate. They are, with a regularity that cannot be coincidence, almost the same thing.

I grew up in a particular kind of alone. Not the alone of physical isolation — there were people around. But the alone of a self that had learned, early and through enough pain, that the interior was safer than the exterior. That ideas were more reliable than people. That depth was available in books and thoughts and the long, solitary work of a mind turning over questions that nobody around you seemed to be asking.

The bullying helped teach this. So did the depression that settled in during adolescence with the quiet authority of something that intended to stay. So did the atheism — not as intellectual conclusion, but as the only framework available to a person for whom the idea of a loving Father had no experiential traction. If no one attunes to you, the God who is personal and present is not an easy sell.

What I built in that season was a capacity for interiority so developed it was almost architectural. A place I could go that no one could reach. Intelligent isolation — which sounds like a clinical term but is really just a description of what happens when a gifted person learns that their mind is the only room where they are reliably safe.

What the Wound Was Actually Building

The problem with survival strategies is that they work. That is what makes them so hard to relinquish. The isolation kept me safe enough to make it through. The interior depth was real. The capacity to live inside ideas, to stay with complexity, to go further down into a question than most people were willing to go — that was not pathology. That was formation. Painful, unasked-for formation, but formation nonetheless.

I did not know, in the middle of it, that I was being prepared for anything. It did not feel like preparation. It felt like the particular texture of a life that was missing something other people seemed to have — ease with people, confidence in rooms, the sense of being naturally included rather than perpetually adjacent.

But the capacity that developed in the isolation — the ability to be genuinely present to an interior, to take the inner life seriously, to follow a thread of meaning further down than is comfortable — that capacity is exactly what the work requires. The psychologist who has never been alone in the way I was alone cannot accompany someone into that place. The writer who has never had to build an interior fortress has less to say about what is inside one.

The survival strategy and the vocation turned out to be the same movement. The isolation that was once a wound became the depth that made the ministry possible.

The Attuned Who Was Not Attuned To

There is a particular irony in becoming a psychologist whose primary gift, the thing clients and supervisees most consistently name, is attunement — the capacity to track another person’s interior state with precision, to feel what they are feeling without being consumed by it, to name what is happening in the room before it has been spoken.

I was not attuned to as a child. Not in the way a developing self requires — consistently, warmly, by someone who delighted in my particular existence rather than my performance of it. The attachment literature is clear on what that absence produces: a nervous system that learns to monitor the environment vigilantly, to read others carefully, to track emotional states not for connection but for safety.

What I did not know is that vigilant monitoring, reoriented, becomes attunement. The hypervigilance of the anxiously attached child and the clinical attunement of the skilled therapist are not opposites. They are the same capacity running on different fuel — fear in one, love in the other. The wound did not have to be undone to become useful. It had to be redeemed.

This is not a therapeutic observation. It is a theological one. Redemption does not erase. It transforms. The scar tissue remains. The limp remains, as it remained for Jacob after he wrestled with God. (Genesis 32:31) What changes is what the wound is now in service of.

The Atheist Who Couldn’t Stop Asking

The atheism of my adolescence was not primarily intellectual. I understand that now in a way I could not have then. It was the only coherent position available to a person for whom the idea of a personal God — a Father who sees, who knows, who is present — had no felt referent. You cannot easily believe in a God whose primary characteristic is loving personal attention if loving personal attention is the thing your nervous system has learned not to expect.

But the questions never stopped. That is the thing about intelligent isolation — it generates questions the way a sealed room generates pressure. With no one to ask, the questions turn inward and deepen. What is this life for? Why does suffering exist without apparent purpose? Why does the longing for something I cannot name persist even in the absence of any framework for naming it?

Those questions did not lead me to faith quickly or easily. They led me through a long, circuitous, resistant process that I would not have chosen and am now unable to regret. Because the faith that was eventually formed in me was not inherited. It was not cultural. It was not the faith of someone who never seriously doubted. It was the faith of someone who went all the way down into the absence and found, at the bottom of it, something that the absence had not been able to eliminate.

That faith is the only kind I know how to write from. It is also, I have come to believe, the only kind that can accompany another person into their own darkness without flinching — because it has been there, and it knows what is at the bottom.

What This Means for You

I am writing this not as autobiography but as pattern — because this pattern is not mine alone, and because I suspect some of you are in the middle of a wound that does not yet look like anything except a wound.

The thing that most isolated you may be what most equips you. The suffering that felt purposeless may be the very formation your calling required. The capacity you developed to survive something you should not have had to survive may be, already, what makes you irreplaceable to the people you are being sent to.

This is not the same as saying the wound was good. It was not good. It was a deprivation, a failure of love, a thing that should not have happened. Redemption does not require us to pretend that the harmful was secretly helpful. It requires only that we hold open the possibility that God can work in what he did not cause — that he can take what was meant to diminish and turn it, slowly, in the hands of a person willing to be formed by it, into the very instrument of someone else’s healing.

The wound does not have to be resolved to be useful. It has to be surrendered — handed over to the One who transforms rather than the one who merely manages.

Paul knew something about this. “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” (2 Corinthians 12:9) He was not being offered relief from the thorn. He was being offered a reframe of what the thorn was for. The weakness was not incidental to the ministry. It was load-bearing.

The wound that is still tender in you, the place you still limp, the room you still sometimes return to out of old habit — that is not evidence that the formation is incomplete. It may be evidence that you are still close enough to it to be useful to someone who is in the middle of it right now.

The most isolated person in the room became the one people call when they cannot talk to anyone else.

That is not irony.

That is what redemption looks like from the inside.

Thank you for reading. This publication exists because people like you show up for it. If it has been worth something to you, consider becoming a paid subscriber — it's the most direct way to support the work and keep it going. I'm grateful either way.